On Tuesday, 4 May 2021, Abahlali baseMjondolo deputy president Mqapheli Bonono and Abahlali member and eKhenana resident Siniko Miya were arrested and charged with ‘conspiracy to commit murder’. These charges stem from witness statements made in relation to a recent meeting with the residents of eKhenana about a murder that took place in Cato Manor in March. The meeting was chaired by Bonono and attended by other senior leaders of Abahlali. Bonono and Miya appeared in the Durban Magistrate’s Court on 6 May for a bail hearing, but the Prosecutor asked for the police to be given more time to gather evidence. A bail hearing was then set for 13 May.
On 12 May, Maphiwe Gasela, also a resident of eKhenana, was similarly charged with conspiracy to commit murder when she handed herself in. Bonono, Miya and Gasela appeared in the Durban Magistrate’s Court on 13 May, however, the bail application was postponed again to 17 May and moved to another court room. Gasela was also taken into custody along with Bonono and Miya. She has been separated from her 16-month old baby who is unwell.
These arrests take place against a backdrop of unrelenting violence against the residents of the eKhenana settlement, carried out by the eThekwini Municipality’s Anti-Land Invasion Unit together with Calvin and Family Security, which is a private security company contracted by the Municipality. In 2020, during lockdown alert level 5 and despite a moratorium on evictions, residents of the eKhenana settlement were attacked, had their homes unlawfully demolished and their property burned on different occasions. These recent arrests also form part of a long history of formal and informal forms of state‑sanctioned violence and harassment that Abahlali have been subjected to for many years.
In terms of section 50(6)(d) of the Criminal Procedure Act, courts may postpone bail proceedings after the initial 48 hour-period following an arrest in order for the police to collect more information or evidence to decide whether a person should be granted bail. However, it has been our experience that prosecutors and police sometimes abuse this process, resulting in repeated postponements of bail applications to punish targeted activists and community leaders. This is despite the requirement that all people be presumed innocent until being proven guilty.
Such misuse of the criminal justice system takes a huge toll on those arrested and their loved ones. It places undue financial, psychological and emotional strain on those affected, often demanding time, energy and resources of family and friends. We condemn these efforts to stifle movements of dissent by the harassment and criminalisation of targeted figures. We reject this abuse of the criminal justice system and call for the urgent release of Mqapheli Bonono, Siniko Miya and Maphiwe Gasela.
Download the press statement here.
On 5 May, SERI, Solidarity Center and Women’s Legal Centre co-hosted a webinar on worker’s rights, intersectionality and accessing justice through litigation, entitled, “Engaging Courts to Further Worker Rights: Mahlangu and Beyond”.
The webinar discussed the recent milestone judgment of the Constitutional Court of South Africa, Mahlangu v the Minister of Labour, in which the Court handed down an order declaring the constitutional invalidity of section 1(xix)(v) of the Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act (COIDA) which excluded domestic workers employed in private households from the definition of "employee", precluding them from claiming from the Compensation Fund for work-related injuries, illnesses or death. The Court also ruled that the order of constitutional invalidity is to have immediate and retrospective effect from 27 April 1994.
The panel discussion included Kelebogile Khunou, SERI researcher; Pinky Mashiane, founder and president of United Domestic Workers (UDWOSA) of South Africa and Atlantic Fellow for Race Equity; Myrtle Witbooi, general secretary of the South African Domestic Service and Allied Workers Union (SADSAWU) and president of the International Domestic Workers Federation, Professor Cathy Albertyn, Research Chair in Equality, Law and Social Justice, School of Law at the University of the Witwatersrand; Natalia Brigagao, Brazilian human rights advocate and; Dr Manoj Dias-Abey, lecturer in Law at the University of Bristol.
The first three presenters were involved in the advocacy campaign for the Mahlangu matter since 2018. Khunou began the panel discussion by providing an overview of the litigation process in Mahlangu highlighting the challenges in implementing the order for domestic workers with retrospective claims. Mashiane, who assisted the Mahlangu family after the death of Maria Mahlangu at her workplace in March 2012, told the story of the origins of the case and the journey to the Constitutional Court. Witbooi then discussed the way forward and the need for civil society organisations to collaborate in realising access to compensation for occupational injuries for domestic workers in South Africa.
The next three presenters provided academic analyses of Mahlangu and workers’ rights issues in a comparative and global context. Professor Albertyn discussed the Mahlangu judgment, its limitations and effect on South Africa’s jurisprudence through a feminist litigation lens. The presentation by Brigagao compared Mahlangu to the Fireworks Factory case in Brazil, in a conversation about litigating with intersectionality. Lastly, Dr Dias-Abey ended the panel presentations by providing an analysis of how social movements in the UK engage with courts effectively.
While the discussion celebrated Mahlangu as a significant victory for vulnerable workers, it also emphasised the challenges ahead in implementing the judgment. Witbooi stated that Mahlangu will be considered a victory only when the one million domestic workers of South Africa are registered by employers and are able to access compensation for occupational injuries should the need arise.
On 8 April 2021, SERI addressed a letter to the Compensation Commissioner on the subject of retrospective claims from domestic workers injured at the workplace as far back as 27 April 1994. The main concern of the letter was the cut-off date for submitting retrospective claims, 20 November 2021, as published by the Compensation Commissioner in the Government Gazette on 10 March 2021. As South Africa celebrates workers in the month of May, SERI wishes to highlight a potential challenge affecting one of the country’s most vulnerable groups of workers.
Domestic workers have been included in the Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act (COIDA) since 19 November 2020, when the Constitutional Court of South Africa handed down a judgment in the Mahlangu v Minister of Labour matter declaring the exclusion of domestic workers from the definition of “employee” in section (xix)(v) of COIDA as unconstitutional. The Court also ruled that the order of constitutional invalidity is to have immediate and retrospective effect from 27 April 1994, which means that domestic workers who have experienced work-related injuries, diseases or death as far back as 27 April 1994, or their dependents, are able to submit claims. Acting in the interest of Sylvia Mahlangu, the first applicant in Mahlangu, SERI submitted a retrospective claim for compensation for the workplace death of her mother which occurred on 31 March 2012.
In light of the Constitutional Court judgment, on 10 March 2021 the Compensation Commissioner published in the Government Gazette No. 44250 a “Notice on the Registration of Domestic Worker Employers in terms of Section 80 of the Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act as Amended”. In terms of this notice, retrospective claims arising on or after 27 April 1994 must be brought to the attention of the Commissioner or the employer within 12 months from 19 November 2020 (i.e. 20 November 2021), failing which the right to claim will lapse.
In the letter, SERI asserts that the cut-off date is unreasonably short considering that it is to apply to a historically marginalised and disadvantaged category of workers. The letter then seeks clarity on the rationale of the cut-off date by asking six questions to the Commissioner:
The importance of retrospectivity in addressing past injustices and ameliorating poverty is explored in the Mahlangu judgment. In determining whether a retrospective order should be given, Acting Justice Victor stated,
“The fact that this case concerns intersectional discrimination is a relevant factor in determining whether a retrospective order should be granted… I am hopeful that the inclusion of domestic workers in the definition of “employee” under COIDA will contribute towards the amelioration of systemic disadvantage suffered by these women and contribute to breaking the cycle of poverty they suffer.”
While the cut-off date for retrospective claims was the main concern, the letter also enquires about the progress of Sylvia Mahlangu’s retrospective claim and invites the Compensation Commissioner to a meeting to engage in person about the queries addressed in the letter. The Compensation Commissioner is yet to respond to the letter.
On Friday, 30 April 2021, SERI made two submissions to the Special Rapporteur on the right to adequate housing in line with the special rapporteur’s call for inputs on housing discrimination and spatial segregation.
In it’s first submission, SERI highlighted the lack of viable formal rental options for inner city residents and how this exacerbates the challenges of unlawful occupations in South Africa. The submission discussed on-going unlawful evictions in spite of protective legislation preventing such, considered the reactive alternative accommodation strategies across municipalities and the relocation of evictees to distant and peripheral areas. Lastly, we discuss the failure to dismantle Apartheid spatial planning and implement progressive legislation in order to achieve spatial justice goals.
The second submission, made in collaborated with the Water Integrity Network (WIN), emphasised the links between the human right to housing and the human rights to water and sanitation, and issues of discrimination and segregation relating to informal settlements. It further emphasised how issues of lack of integrity, transparency, accountability and corruption contribute to violations of these human rights. Our main message is that a framework of water integrity, which promotes human rights and protects non-discrimination and equality, participation, transparency, accountability, and anti-corruption, would support improved delivery of water and sanitation in informal settlements. It would also allow such communities to more effectively hold government to account for failure to deliver services.
On 22 April 2021, SERI made an oral submission on the Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Amendment Bill to the Portfolio Committee on Employment and Labour. SERI was represented by researcher Kelebogile Khunou and senior attorney Thulani Nkosi. The public hearings were held virtually.
The submission focuses on the inclusion of domestic workers in the Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act 130 of 1993 (COIDA) in light of the Constitutional Court judgment in the Mahlangu v Minister of Labour matter.
In this matter, SERI represented Sylvia Mahlangu, the daughter of domestic worker Maria Mahlangu who accidentally drowned at her employer’s home in 2012, and the South African Domestic Service and Allied Workers Union (SADSAWU).
On 19 November 2020, the Constitutional Court handed down an order declaring the constitutional invalidity of section 1(xix)(v) of COIDA which excluded domestic workers employed in private households from the definition of "employee", precluding them from claiming from the Compensation Fund for work-related injuries, illnesses or death. The Court also ruled that the order of constitutional invalidity is to have immediate and retrospective effect from 27 April 1994, which means that those domestic workers and dependents who have experienced work-related injuries, diseases, or death as far back as 27 April 1994 are also able to submit their claims.
In the oral submission, SERI researcher, Kelebogile Khunou described SERI’s experience in submitting a retrospective claim on behalf of Sylvia Mahlangu, which started in December 2020, for compensation for the death of Maria Mahlangu, Sylvia's mother, which occurred in March 2012. The process has revealed problems in sections of the Act, namely sections 38, 39, 41, and 44. These sections make processing Mahlangu’s claim or any other retrospective claim impossible. SERI’s interest in the COID Act Amendment Bill 2020 is to ensure that domestic workers, as a class of employees, are sufficiently protected and that the Constitutional Court judgment in Mahlangu v Minister of Labour is fully complied with.
Khunou also highlighted the interrelated challenges affecting the realisation of domestic workers rights namely 1) widespread non-compliance from employers; and 2) the challenge of enforcement, which need to be addressed to ensure domestic workers enjoy their labour rights.
Overall, the submission asserts that a mechanism must be put in place to enable the Compensation Fund to process retrospective claims from domestic workers. The submission recommends that the Department of Employment and Labour should:
Find relevant material here: