The water crisis in Cape Town has made a number of senior government officials in Gauteng ask very serious questions about the province's ability to deal with any potential water security issues. In late March 2018, the Gauteng premier David Makhura hosted a Premier's Coordinating Forum where the premier and mayors of all municipalities met to discuss various important issues, including water security. After the meeting, the premier established a "water war room" (where senior technical and political officials across the province can meet to engage on important water related issues) and requested that a panel of experts develop a strategic plan for dealing with water security in Gauteng.
On 5 July 2018, a review panel was assembled to consider and provide strategic input into the second draft of the strategic plan on Gauteng's water security in Braamfontein, Johannesburg. SERI's director or research and advocacy, Alana Potter, participated in the review as a water expert. Others who participated in the review included the Gauteng City Regional Observatory (GCRO) and the Pegasys Institute (these two organisations constitute the drafting team), the Gauteng planning department and the premier's office.
Potter's review highlighted a number of faultlines in the current provision of water services in Gauteng. In particular, SERI's presentation underscored that chemical toilets don’t meet the standards for adequate levels of human dignity and privacy. Accordingly, chemical toilets should not be used for more than three months according to the Emergency Housing Programme (EHP). This means that they don’t meet basic, let alone, improved standards. SERI's presentation also emphasised the need to address the backlog of households who still do not have access to safe, reliable water in Gauteng. Despite the significant gains that have been made since democracy, water and sanitation services delivery remains profoundly unequal with over 280,000 people who still do not have access to safe, reliable water in the province. These people are the most vulnerable and poorest, and primarily live in rural municipalities and informal settlements. Addressing this backlog is an urgent priority.
Based on the review, the Gauteng Water Security Plan will be finalised and taken back to the “water war room”. Thereafter, the premier’s office will host a two-day water summit with all stakeholders to be engage with interested parties, business and civil society.
On 11 July 2018, SERI attorney, Lindokuhle Mdabe, participated in a panel discussion on land and land reform in South Africa on David O'Sullivan's Breakfast show on Kaya FM 95.9. The panel discussion also included King Madzikane II Thandisizwe Diko from the KwaBhaca Great Kingdom, Advocate Tembeka Ngcukaitobi and Lyn Apies from the Griqua Royal House, and dealt with a wide array of issues, including land dispossession, customary law and the South African Constitution.
Mdabe reflected on the historical roots that underlie the spatial injustice which contiues to characterise South Africa today and spoke about the need for the state to more creatively utilise the existing mechanisms at its disposal for land reform. He specifically refers to section 9(3) of the Housing Act 107 of 1997 (the Housing Act), which enables the state to expropriate land for the purposes of providing housing. He criticised the lack of implementation by state officials, stating:
"The state has been recalcitrant in using expropriation measures in the law to expropriate for land reform."
On 6 July 2018, SERI senior research associate, Michael Clark, was interviewed on Thabiso Tema's Power Drive show on Power FM, where he discussed two recent research publications on informal trade published by the Socio-Economic Rights Institute of South Africa (SERI) and the South African Local Government Association (SALGA). These research reports dispel persistent myths associated with informal trade and clarify the often misunderstood legal and constitutional duties of municipalities towards informal traders.
In 2017, approximately 1.1 million South Africans worked as informal traders (according to Stats SA's Quaterly Labour Force Survey). Informal trade therefore makes up a significant component of the economy and has an important role to play in addressing some of South Africa’s most pervasive developmental challenges, including high levels of unemployment and poverty.
A key myth that was dispelled by the research findings was that "informal does not mean illegal". During the interview, Clark pointed out that informal traders are often acting entirely lawfully. In fact, informal traders often go out of their way to obtain valid informal trading licenses, pay rental for their demarcated trading stalls, and try to ensure that they comply with legal formalities such. For this reason:
"The findings point to the fact that we need to start reassessing why so many people stigmatise informal trade when many traders act entirely lawfully. These perceptions of informal trade as a form of 'criminality' or as something that causes 'crime and grime' in our cities are just biases that don’t necessarily have a basis in reality. So we need to not leave these biases unchecked."
On 6 July 2018, the Socio-Economic Rights Institute of South Africa (SERI) and the South African Local Government Association (SALGA) launched two new ground-breaking research publications that dispel persistent myths associated with informal trade in South Africa and clarify, often misunderstood, legal and constitutional obligation of local government in relation to informal trade. The launch took place at SERI's offices in Johannesburg and was attended by academics, government officials, civil society representative and informal traders.
The first publication, Informal Trade in South Africa: Legislation, Case Law and Recommendations for Local Government (June 2018), responds to the fact that municipalities have struggled to fully come to terms with the law relating to informal trade. The report unpacks court judgments which have substantially contributed to the rights of informal traders and identifies a range of legal principles governing the rights, duties and obligations of informal traders, law enforcement officers and local government. The report dispels a number of longstanding myths associated with informal trade, including the belief that the law does not grant protection to foreign nationals who participate in informal trade, that informal traders often act illegally or unlawfully while trading, and that the only regulatory mechanisms available to local government are the impoundment of traders’ goods and the eviction or relocation of traders.
The second publication, Towards Recommendations on the Regulation of Informal Trade at Local Government Level (June 2018), provides a set of recommendations to local government on how informal trade can be regulated in a manner that respects the rights of informal traders, and is just, humane and inclusive.
In 2017, over 1.1 million South Africans worked as informal traders. Informal trade makes up a significant component of the economy and has an important role to play in addressing some of South Africa’s most pervasive development challenges, including high levels of unemployment and poverty. These research papers seek to assist local government in understanding their legal and constitutional obligations toward informal traders. With knowledge of the law, local government can alter their approach to informal trade by supporting and nurturing this essential sector while also boosting economic growth.
Unpacking the papers during the launch were Caroline Skinner (Senior Researcher at the African Centre for Cities (ACC)), Nomzamo Zondo (SERI Director of Litigation), Michael Clark (SERI Senior Research Associate), Thabang Motaung (Johannesburg Regional Chairperson of the South African Informal Traders Forum (SAITF)), and Charles Parkerson (SALGA Director of Economic Development).
On 4 July 2018, SERI researcher, Kelebogile Khunou, was interviewed on John Maytham's Afternoon Drive show on Cape Talk radio, where she discussed the City of Johannesburg's new recycling plans and how these plans are likely to side-line and threaten the livelihoods of waste reclaimers.
Over 10,000 people make a living as waste reclaimers or informal recyclers in Johannesburg. However, the City of Johannesburg's new separation at source initiative may hamper this vulnerable group's ability to earn a living.
During the interview, Khunou noted that while Johannesburg's separation at source initiative seems, on the face of it, to be a good idea "the way the City is going about it, threatens the livelihoods of thousands of people who have actually been providing Johannesburg residents with recycling services for decades." She highlighted a recent survey conducted by Women in Informal Employment Globalizing and Organizing (WIEGO), which found that waste reclaimers have lost about 60% of their incomes since the introduction of the City's separation at Source programme.
Khunou also address the stigma many waste reclaimers face and said that we have to recognise the value of waste relcaimers' work. As she noted:
"Without a separation at source programme or anything similar, South Africa has been able to collect recyclables at a rate of 57% which is among the highest in the world. Our rates surpass countries like Brazil and India and fall just behind Europe and the US. And the peope who have developed the recycling industry in South Africa are the very same people that people regard as 'criminals' and a 'blight' on our cities."